Clockoli vs Harvest
Sergey NikolaevCo-founder at Clockoli
Harvest is the closest thing to a direct competitor on the list. It claims 70,000+ companies, and it is really an invoicing product with a timer attached rather than a tracker that later learned to bill. If getting money out of clients is the whole job, it has years of head start on the paperwork around it.
What Harvest does better
Invoicing maturity. Clockoli now invoices from a filtered report — numbered, taxed, printed or saved as PDF — but that is where it stops. Harvest adds the paperwork around getting paid: recurring invoices, reminders, payment integrations and expenses. If chasing money is the main job, Harvest is the more complete product.
The GitHub integration is the best of the set. A “Track time” button on every issue and pull request header, and — the good part — the popup tells you ”Write copy outline has 1:45 tracked to it” before you start. It remembers the project per repository and the task per issue for the whole team, and the entry links back to the issue. That per-task context is the cheapest useful thing any of these extensions do, and we intend to copy it.
Duration-first, deliberately. The default day view is a timesheet: project, task, hours. Start and stop times are hidden behind an account-wide setting. Plenty of teams genuinely never want to think about intervals, and Harvest is honest about building for them. Day tabs across the week carry per-day totals and act as the navigator for the whole timesheet.
What Clockoli does that Harvest cannot
| Where your hours live | Plain JSONL files in your GitHub repo | Vendor-hosted service |
|---|---|---|
| Writing to several places at once | One install, a repository per client, each one owned by that client | A separate Harvest account per company |
| Own your data without running a server | GitHub is the backend; no separate tracker server or database | No customer-controlled backend in SaaS |
| Source code | Open source (GPL-3.0 or later) | Proprietary service |
| Free plans and team costs | Core is free; no seat or usage limits. GitHub limits apply | Free: 1 seat, 2 projects; paid teams |
| Reporting | Cross-repo team reports; browser-local billable rates | Time reports; advanced reporting by plan |
| Who can read task titles | Anyone with repo read access; hosted by GitHub | Account roles and project access |
| Hourly rates and teammate access | Browser-local, not in shared time files; protect browser access and exports | Service-stored; role-controlled visibility |
| Getting your data out | Canonical files already in Git; clone, CSV/JSON, print to PDF | Report exports and API |
| Corrections kept as history | Git commits, not an immutable compliance audit log | Activity log: Enterprise |
| Tracking while on GitHub | In-page issue/PR timer; any URL via popup | In-page issue/PR integration |
| Invoicing | Built in and free; rendered in your browser, never committed | Included; plan/usage limits apply |
| Mobile app | None | iOS and Android |
| Browsers and desktop | Chrome Web Store extension; Firefox and Safari builds in testing | Web, browser integrations; Mac/Windows apps |
Checked September 10, 2026. Kimai and solidtime columns describe self-hosting unless marked Cloud; Tempo describes Timesheets Cloud. Free core software does not make hosting or paid add-ons free. Sources and details.
Two rows are worth expanding.
Rate privacy. Harvest stores rates in its service with role-controlled access; that does not mean every teammate sees them. Clockoli keeps rates out of shared time files. Access to the browser and financial exports still needs protection.
Getting your data out. Harvest provides report exports and an API. Clockoli’s canonical records are already files in Git that you can clone. Its commit history is inspectable, but is not an immutable audit log. Harvest also offers an activity log on Enterprise; see the sourced comparison.
Harvest’s current pricing includes a Free plan for one seat and two projects, with invoicing and expenses. Team plans and some usage are paid. Check those limits against your actual billing workflow.
Which to pick
Take Harvest if the billing paperwork is the job — retainers, reminders and payment links. That is not a hedge; it is the answer. Also take it if your team wants duration-only timesheets and never wants to see a start time.
Take Clockoli if you want precise intervals per URL, or if you would rather your rates and your clients’ task titles were not in a separate tracker’s database. You can invoice from those hours while the time records stay in your GitHub repository.
Clockoli is free and open source. See what it does or read the code.